A description of abortion debate in favor of pro life stance

No limits but full disclosure Ban soft money Source: And I have spent many years now, as a private citizen, as first lady, and now as senator, trying to make it rare, trying to create the conditions where women had other choices. I have supported adoption, foster care.

A description of abortion debate in favor of pro life stance

However, much has happened since it went up, including the Blogger outage. Scroll down for a report on that. More new posts will be added below this one. The essay below is the conclusion of the ninth part in a series by Takuan Seiyo.

See the list at the bottom of this post for links to the previous installments.

Sign up for daily e-mails

Their main endeavor has been to enforce their compulsory e. K and discretionary e. Nor the evils of the worldwide Islamic Inquisition which — not in the 16th century but now, in the 21st, condemns Muslim apostates to barbaric execution.

Instead, aggressive White androphobes of all genders which I can no longer count are decimating the philogynous and egalitarian West.

A description of abortion debate in favor of pro life stance

Equality psychos are tearing down the most egalitarian society that ever existed except for initial communist experiments, before they turned bloody. American Jews, at the apex of the greatest fortune and philosemitic tolerance their long diaspora has ever bestowed on their kind, are busy supporting all the ideologies and policies that demolish their safe harbor and build up their Muslim, Black and Third World enemies.

Leftoid masochists and the Christian meek call for returning Hawaii to the Hawaiians and capitulating before a massive Mexican reconquista of one-third of America.

The rightful Etruscan landowners are not bearing angry placards in front of the Vatican. The Japanese are not planning to relinquish Hokkaido to its original owners, the Ainu.

The tall, white and fair-haired Chachapoyas of the Andean forest have, alas, no remnants left to sue the Incas for genocide in a Peruvian court of law.

However, even that great moral abyss of Western civilization — the Holocausts — stands out more in its industrialized and organizational features than it does either in the quality of its hatefulness or its relative or even absolute volumes.

In relative numbers, in just one year,the Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda, killed off a total of one million, in a population of 7 million.

Abortion debate - Wikipedia

Is it more humane to go by a stroke of a blunt machete than by a whiff of Zyklon B? The Khmer Rouge murdered at least 2 million Cambodians between and Is it more humane to die by wallops from a Cambodian pickaxe handle than by a bullet from a German Mauser?

Inscription on the back in German: But the Holocausts do not prove that Whites are worse than other people, just that they are no better. The history of the Third Reich also proves that with the right formula of economic blowup, misery and humiliation, sparked by charismatic evil, no people are immune to such horror, at no time.Get The Wall Street Journal’s Opinion columnists, editorials, op-eds, letters to the editor, and book and arts reviews.

The pro-life vs.

Related Stories Can you do it with rational arguments? What should you say?

pro-choice debate tends to overlook the fact that the vast majority of women who have abortions do not do so by choice, at least not entirely. Circumstances put them in a position where abortion is the least self-destructive option available.

The Abortion Debate

During the Libertarian Party debate that aired on Fox Business Network on April 1, , Johnson said he was in favor of legalized abortion. [40] On his presidential campaign website, Johnson wrote, "Life is precious and must be protected. Abortion is no exception to this rule: when the topic of abortion is discussed, people tend to assume one of two standpoints: pro-life or pro-choice.

A person who is pro-life believes that women should not have the ability to abort a human life because it would constitute murder. History.

Reprints ›

In the late s, a number of organizations were formed to mobilize opinion against the legalization of abortion. In the United States, the National Right to Life Committee was formed in , while in Australia, the National Right to Life formed in The description "pro-life" was adopted by the right-to-life (anti-abortion) movement in the United States following the Supreme.

Archives and past articles from the Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News, and alphabetnyc.com

Former Satanist: “I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics” - The Lepanto Institute